Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

People

Big things are happening at Ogier. Change is embedded in everything we do. It is redefining our talent, our ways of working, our platforms of delivery, our culture.

Expertise

Services

We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.

View all Services

Employment law

Intellectual Property

Listing services

Restructuring and Insolvency

Business Services Team

Executive Team

German Desk

Accounting and Financial Reporting Services

Cayman Islands AML/CFT training

Corporate Services

Debt Capital Markets

Governance Services

Investor Services

Ogier Connect

Private Wealth Services

Real Estate Services

Regulatory and Compliance Services

Ogier Global

Consulting

View all Consulting

Sustainable Investment Consulting

LexTech - Technology Consultants

Business Services Team

View all Business Services Team

Sectors

Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.

View all Sectors

Aviation and Marine

BVI Law in Europe and Asia

Energy and Natural Resources

Family Office

Foreign direct investment (FDI)

Funds Hub

Private Equity

Real Estate

Restructuring and Insolvency

Sustainable Investing and ESG

Technology and Web3

Trusts Advisory Group

Locations

Ogier provides practical advice on BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Irish, Jersey and Luxembourg law through our global network of offices across the Asian, Caribbean and European timezones. Ogier is the only firm to advise on this unique combination of laws.

News and insights

Keep up to date with industry insights, analysis and reviews. Find out about the work of our expert teams and subscribe to receive our newsletters straight to your inbox.

Fresh thinking, sharper opinion.

About us

We get straight to the point, managing complexity to get to the essentials. Our global network of offices covers every time zone. 

No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm

Employment update: the Right to Disconnect in Ireland

Insight

14 November 2024

Ireland

3 min read

ON THIS PAGE

RELATED

Save as PDF

In an age where technology blurs the lines between professional and personal life, employees and employers alike are tasked with overcoming the challenges posed by the "always-on" culture.

Failing to understand and implement the Right to Disconnect properly can expose businesses to significant legal and reputational risks. Ireland has taken progressive steps to reflect a growing recognition of the need for a healthy work-life balance to combat these challenges, as outlined by our Employment team below.

Understanding the right to disconnect

The Right to Disconnect allows employees to refrain from engaging in work-related communications, such as emails, calls, and messages, outside of their normal working hours. This right is part of a broader government strategy to promote mental health and to prevent burnout.

Legal framework

In Ireland, there is no explicit statutory right to disconnect laid out under legislation. The Organised Working Time Act 1997 (the 1997 Act) sets out minimum rest periods and daily and weekly break requirements for employees. To comply with the 1997 Act, employers must give their employees a minimum 11 hour rest period at the end of the working day and a weekly rest period of 24 continuous hours. This usually occurs at the weekend.

Aside from the 1997 Act, Ireland has also adopted Codes of Practices to show its dedication to enforcing the Right to Disconnect. These include a Code of Practice for Employers and Employees on the Right to Disconnect 2021, a Code of Practice on the Right to Request Flexible Working, and the Right to Request Remote Working 2024 (the Codes). While not legislatively binding, the codes are implemented on authority derived from Section 20(2) of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 which governs the employment relationship between employers and employees. The codes provide practical guidance for implementing the right to disconnect within the workplace. They apply to all types of employment, whether remote, office-based, or hybrid.

The codes outline certain rights such as:

  1. the right of an employee to not have to routinely perform work outside their normal working hours
  2. the right to not be penalised for refusing to attend to work matters outside of normal working hours
  3. the right of an employee to make flexible or remote working arrangements and the obligation for an employer to consider them
  4. the duty to respect another person’s right to disconnect (e.g., by not routinely emailing or calling outside normal working hours)

Background to the case law

In 2018, the Labour Court found that an employee had surpassed the statutory maximum working hours by sending and receiving work-related emails outside of normal work hours. The Court notably determined in Kepak Convenience Foods Unlimited Company v Grainne O' Hara (DWT1820) that the employer had "permitted" the employee to work excessively by failing to monitor and curtail her working pattern. The employer was found to have violated the Act and an award of €7,500 was granted to the employee.

In Alina Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd, the WRC issued its first decision regarding the right to request flexible and remote working under the Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023 (the 2023 Act). The Complainant submitted a request to work remotely full-time, citing reasons such as lack of suitable accommodation in Dublin, reduction in commute time, and an overall improved quality of life. The Respondent complied with the timelines set out in the 2023 Act and, after consideration, refused the request with reasons provided. The Complainant alleged that her needs were not considered objectively, fairly, or reasonably. The Adjudication Officer identified three distinct duties under the Act:

  • First duty: the employer must consider the request considering its needs and the employee’s needs
  • Second and third duties: the employer must either approve the request or, notify the employee in writing of the refusal within four weeks, with the possibility of extending the consideration period up to eight weeks

The Adjudication Officer found the Respondent complied with these timelines.

Navigating challenges

Despite its benefits, the implementation of the Right to Disconnect poses challenges. For multinational companies, there may be requirements for flexibility in roles with irregular hours and / or global teams. Certain businesses can also face deadlines and a need for employees to be available for urgent communications. It is difficult to balance these high-pressure roles with disconnecting, but there are some steps both employers and employees can take respectively.

For employers

Employers should:

  • develop and communicate a right to disconnect company policy
  • train management and staff on the importance of respecting employees' downtime
  • encourage employees to manage time sensitive tasks within working hours
  • use technology solutions to support compliance, such as email footers indicating non-urgency
  • schedule emails within work hours

For employees

Employees are encouraged to:

  • be mindful of sending communications outside of recipients' working hours
  • establish clear boundaries (where reasonably applicable) with clients and colleagues of their own working hours

It is harder for employees to establish boundaries with their employers, so employers are encouraged to show active commitment to flexibility, communication, and mutual respect with their employees. If not, it could be to the detriment of the employer, as seen in the aforementioned Kepak case.

Conclusion

The Right to Disconnect in Ireland represents a significant step towards recognising and addressing the challenges of modern work environments.

While there is no explicit statutory right, the 1997 Act, the 2003 Act and the Codes of Practice provide a framework that encourages both employers and employees to respect boundaries between professional and personal time. Key cases such as Kepak and the TikTok case demonstrate the potential repercussions for employers who fail to monitor and respect these boundaries.

Overall, Ireland is seeking to set a precedent for promoting employee well-being by fostering a culture that values downtime as much as productivity.

How Ogier can help

For more information on the Right to Disconnect or any measures that may affect your organisation's workforce, please contact a member of our Employment & Corporate Immigration team via their contact details below.

About Ogier

Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.

Disclaimer

This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.

Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice

No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Blocks.SiteBlocks.CookiePolicySiteBlockVm